Section 33 of The Indira Gandhi National Open University Act, 1985
If any question arises as to whether any person has been duly elected or appointed as, or is entitled to be a member of any authority or other body of the University, the matter shall be referred to the Visitor whose decision thereon shall be final.
Summary
- This provision deals with disagreements regarding the internal makeup of the University's governing groups.
- It applies if someone questions if an individual was correctly elected or appointed to a University body.
- It also applies when there is a question about whether a person has a right to be a member of such an authority.
- All such questions or disputes must be referred to the Visitor of the University.
- The decision made by the Visitor on these matters is final and cannot be appealed.
Practical examples
FAQ
1. What kind of bodies does this section cover?
It covers any "authority or other body of the University," which includes groups like the Academic Council or the Planning Board.
2. Can I go to a court if I think the election was rigged?
The Act directs these specific questions to the Visitor, whose decision is final, meaning the Visitor is the ultimate authority for these internal disputes.
Test yourself
Q1.Under Section 33 of The Indira Gandhi National Open University Act, 1985, who decides if a person has been "duly elected" to a University authority?
Q2.What is the legal effect of the Visitor's decision under Section 33 of The Indira Gandhi National Open University Act, 1985?
Q3.Which of the following issues would be handled under Section 33 of The Indira Gandhi National Open University Act, 1985?
Q4.Under Section 33 of The Indira Gandhi National Open University Act, 1985, a dispute regarding the constitution of which of the following would be referred to the Visitor?