Section 8 of The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
No act or proceeding of the Board
shall be invalid merely by reason of—
- (a)any vacancy in, or any defect in the constitution of, the Board; or
- (b)any defect in the appointment of a person acting as a member of the Board; or
- (c)any irregularity in the procedure of the Board not affecting the merits of the case.
Summary
- Actions or proceedings of the Board cannot be considered invalid simply because there is an empty seat or a defect in how the Board was formed.
- Decisions remain valid even if there is a defect in the appointment of someone acting as a Board member.
- Procedural mistakes or irregularities by the Board will not invalidate its actions, provided those mistakes do not affect the actual merits of the case.
Practical examples
FAQ
1. Can a decision be cancelled just because the Board was missing a member?
No, no act or proceeding is invalid merely by reason of any vacancy in the Board.
2. What if someone acting as a member was not appointed perfectly?
The proceedings are still valid, as a defect in the appointment of a person acting as a member does not invalidate the Board's actions.
3. Do procedural errors ruin a Board's decision?
Only if the error affects the actual merits of the case. Minor irregularities in procedure do not invalidate the proceedings.
Test yourself
Q1.Under Section 8 of The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, which of the following would NOT invalidate an act of the Board?
Q2.Under Section 8 of The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, what condition applies to procedural irregularities for them to NOT invalidate a proceeding?
Q3.Under Section 8 of The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, what is the effect of a defect in the appointment of a person acting as a member?
Q4.Under Section 8 of The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, what is the primary purpose of this specific provision?