Section 91 of The Navy Act, 1957
If a single act or series of acts is of such a nature that it is doubtful which of several offences the acts which can be proved will constitute, the accused may be charged with having committed all or any of such offences, and any number of such charges may be tried at one trial; or he may be charged in the alternative with having committed some one of the said offences.
Summary
- The single most important thing this provision does is allow a person to be charged with multiple possible offences if it is unclear which specific rule their action broke.
- If a single act or series of acts could be seen as different crimes, the accused can be charged with having committed all of them.
- All of these different potential charges can be examined in just one trial.
- Alternatively, the person can be charged with having committed one offence or another as alternate possibilities.
Practical examples
FAQ
1. What happens if an action fits multiple crimes under Section 91 of The Navy Act, 1957?
Under Section 91 of The Navy Act, 1957, if it is doubtful which offence the acts constitute, the person can be charged with all the possible offences.
2. Can a person be charged with alternative crimes under Section 91 of the 1957 Navy law?
Yes, Section 91 of The Navy Act, 1957 allows a person to be charged in the alternative with having committed some one of the possible offences.
3. Do we need separate trials if someone faces multiple potential charges under Section 91 of the naval rules?
No, Section 91 of The Navy Act, 1957 specifically states that any number of such alternative or multiple charges may be tried at one single trial.
Test yourself
Q1.When does Section 91 of The Navy Act, 1957 apply to a legal case?
Q2.If an act could be two different crimes, how can the charges be structured under Section 91 of The Navy Act, 1957?
Q3.How many trials are needed if someone is charged with several possible offences under Section 91 of the naval discipline law?
Q4.What is the main purpose of charging someone in the alternative under Section 91 of The Navy Act, 1957?